8/8/2023 0 Comments Topaz detailI'm a long time Photoshop and Lightroom user and though I'm no expert I have taught a number of classes in both for our local art association. No doubt, there are press preprocessing and graphics arts professionals can do much more with LR and PS than I can manage and perhaps generate better results than the Topaz tools but personally I'm very impressed with what those tools can do and in the hard cases can't really achieve equivalent results using LR or PS.īut of course like all post processing discussions the better the capture in the camera the less we have to rely on fancy tools in post. Similarly, it's not too hard to remove a bit of high ISO noise using the sliders in LR or things like Gaussian Blur filters and some masking in PS but I find it very hard to match what Topaz DeNoise can do automatically with images captured at high ISOs especially with my D5 files. I can achieve pretty similar sharpening results for many images using the tools available in PS and for simple slightly soft images can do fine in LR but when it comes to things like modest motion blur I can't get anywhere near the results that Topaz Sharpen AI does easily. SUPER improvement over the originals and I can print something bigger than 4圆 if I wanted to.Ĭlick to expand.I'm a long time Photoshop and Lightroom user and though I'm no expert I have taught a number of classes in both for our local art association. I have used Gigapixel on them to up to 4x the original size and WOW! Converted to RAW and did my thing in Photoshop. I have a bunch of very old digital pictures of family trips to Yellowstone. What I'm really excited about is Gigapixel and JPG to RAW. Sharpen works well, but I don't use it as much. All the programs fly on that machine! Windows 10 actually works with all that RAM! I recently purchased a new PC, custom from DELL and I loaded up the RAM (32 GB) and went with a high-end graphics card. I ran it through DeNoise and it came back a real keeper! I had a shot of Tundra Swans flying against the orange sunset (15 minutes after sunset) that was pretty much a throw-a-way due to noise. It really works well with bird shots against a blue sky and any high ISO shot. I have been very pleased with the results with DeNoise and would consider it a "must-have". Depending on the size of the underlying photo, it is not super fast on my machine, but it's fast enough given the results. I think the graphics card may be more important than basic ram for speed here. I have a 2019 iMac with 128 gb of ram and an 8 gb graphics card. If there is a downside to the Topaz AI programs, other than cost, it's probably how long it takes. That often gives me the best overall result. In some cases, with particularly noisy photos, I first run the image through DxO PhotoLab 4 (using either Prime or Deep Prime noise reduction) first, export to Photoshop and then use Denoise. I normally use Denoise first (with noise reduction off in ACR, except for color noise reduction). It seems good too, although I have not done any scientific tests. (I do most of my work in Photoshop, so I don't use PhotoLabs for most of my work.) I recently upgraded my PhotoLab 3 to PhotoLab 4, to get access to Deep Prime noise reduction. I also like and have used DxO PhotoLab for several years - mostly to have access to Prime noise reduction which I have found useful for noisy images and good for feathers and fur. Since then, both Denoise and Sharpen have added a comparative view mode that I find useful. I decided to do so, given I like the software and given it may be good for a company to have the incentive to continue to improve its product. I had the same question earlier this year when I got the message I needed to renew my license to get updated versions. I use Gigapixel and JPEG to Raw less frequently, but also find them useful (Gigapixel more than Jpeg to Raw). It may well be that people with sufficient expertise could do something similar in Photoshop without Topaz, but not me. I use Denoise and Sharpen a lot and think they are very good.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |